Callum Laird AS Foundation Portfolio
Sunday 19 April 2015
Tuesday 14 April 2015
Evaluation Questions 6 & 7
Evaluation Questions 6&7
6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the main task?
6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the main task?
Monday 13 April 2015
Evaluation Question 4 - Who would be the audience for you media product?
Who would be the
audience for your media product?
Our media audience would most likely be the age demographic of 15
years and over due to the mature subject matter that surrounds the
film. People who are under the age of 15 may not understand or be
interested in the film due to their lack of understanding and
interest in the British government and politics. Although our film is
entirely fiction and human testing is almost certainly not being used
by the government, there is still a deep-lying political
consciousness surrounding the film, so we feel that this will
intrigue the minds of people aged over 15.
Although our film is aimed at all people over the ages of 15, I feel
like the supernatural element may alienate older audience who are not
interested in films like ours. This is due to the completely
fictional aspect of our film with the combination of human testing
and the supernatural element of the entity that our protagonist sees.
The slight horror element due to the mystery surrounding the
supernatural character may categorise our film as a
“horror-thriller”, again alienating the older audiences who do
not get as much of a thrill from being scared. I feel like an older
audience may be more interested in films that have a chance of being
plausible, however I feel ours passes this boundary. For this reason
I would state that our key demographic would be the age range of
15-45.
Finally, I feel like the slight action element to the film may
disinterest female viewers and would appeal more to the male
audience. I do not feel like there would be a huge gender split, but
feel like their would be slightly more males interested in our films.
I also feel like the graphic nature may also scare off the female
viewers due to the gore scenes which may occur. This is a rather
stereotypical view that women are more squeamish than men when it
comes to gore and may not like watching films of that nature, but I
do feel that it may stop some more female viewers than male viewers
watching our film.
Saturday 11 April 2015
Evaluation Question 3
What kind of media institutions might distribute
your media product and why?
I think that 'Studio Canal UK' may distribute our film due to their prior collaborations with 'Warp Films'. They distributed the films ''71' as well as 'Four Lions' and 'Dead Man's Shoes', which were created by 'Warp Films'. This shows that the company has prior experience with distributing independent films so would understand the market. The fact that they also distributed 'Dead Man's Shoes' and 'Four Lions' shows that the company are willing to take risks with films, as long as they like the content that they have seen, due to the graphic nature of 'Dead Man's Shoes' and the controversial terrorism satire used in 'Four Lions'. This means that if there were to be any gore or violence in our film, then they would most likely still go ahead and distribute our product. I do not think that 'Studio Canal' are as fixated on profit as a huge conglomerate like 'Warner Bros.' are either. The evidence in this is that 'Dead Man's Shoes' had a budget of £723,000 yet only grossed £101,186, yet they decided to distribute further projects of 'Warp Films' after this film. I think that this shows that 'Studio Canal' are more focused on the quality of a film and the accolades it receives than the intake in profits that they receive. 'Warner Bros.' may not be the best choice for our film as they would be more driven on making as much money as possible so some aspects of our film may need to be changed in order to appeal to a wider audience, such as our actor being changed from Matt Wells to an American actor.
I feel like 'Studio Canal' may be interested in our film due to the independence it has and the specific market that it may interest. The psychological aspect of our film may interest 'Studio Canal' due to the niche market that it would appeal to, and due to the fact that a fairly similar film in 'Donnie Darko' not only received positive reviews, but also made profit. This is a similar film to ours, however our film still is very different to this film and has it's own unique ideas, so I feel like this may interest them. 'Studio Canal UK' are also obviously a British film production company so we would have greater chance with getting them to distribute our film than a huge American conglomerate, as 'Studio Canal' would enjoy seeing British films being made so would have no problems with sticking to a British setting and cast, and would possibly prefer this.
I think that 'Studio Canal UK' may distribute our film due to their prior collaborations with 'Warp Films'. They distributed the films ''71' as well as 'Four Lions' and 'Dead Man's Shoes', which were created by 'Warp Films'. This shows that the company has prior experience with distributing independent films so would understand the market. The fact that they also distributed 'Dead Man's Shoes' and 'Four Lions' shows that the company are willing to take risks with films, as long as they like the content that they have seen, due to the graphic nature of 'Dead Man's Shoes' and the controversial terrorism satire used in 'Four Lions'. This means that if there were to be any gore or violence in our film, then they would most likely still go ahead and distribute our product. I do not think that 'Studio Canal' are as fixated on profit as a huge conglomerate like 'Warner Bros.' are either. The evidence in this is that 'Dead Man's Shoes' had a budget of £723,000 yet only grossed £101,186, yet they decided to distribute further projects of 'Warp Films' after this film. I think that this shows that 'Studio Canal' are more focused on the quality of a film and the accolades it receives than the intake in profits that they receive. 'Warner Bros.' may not be the best choice for our film as they would be more driven on making as much money as possible so some aspects of our film may need to be changed in order to appeal to a wider audience, such as our actor being changed from Matt Wells to an American actor.
I feel like 'Studio Canal' may be interested in our film due to the independence it has and the specific market that it may interest. The psychological aspect of our film may interest 'Studio Canal' due to the niche market that it would appeal to, and due to the fact that a fairly similar film in 'Donnie Darko' not only received positive reviews, but also made profit. This is a similar film to ours, however our film still is very different to this film and has it's own unique ideas, so I feel like this may interest them. 'Studio Canal UK' are also obviously a British film production company so we would have greater chance with getting them to distribute our film than a huge American conglomerate, as 'Studio Canal' would enjoy seeing British films being made so would have no problems with sticking to a British setting and cast, and would possibly prefer this.
Friday 10 April 2015
Wednesday 8 April 2015
Evaluation Question 1
In what ways does your media product use, develop, or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)